Comparative Effectiveness of Single Versus Combination Antihypertensive Therapy in PROLANIS Hypertension Patients: A Retrospective Study in Purbalingga Regency

Authors

  • Khamdiyah Indah Kurniasih Department of Chemical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, Indonesia/Pharmacy Study Program, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Banyumas, Indonesia
  • Nanang Munif Yasin Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Indonesia
  • Pri Iswati Utami Department of Chemical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/amcr.v5i4.625

Keywords:

Antihypertensive therapy, Blood pressure control, Combination therapy, Hypertension, PROLANIS

Abstract

The PROLANIS program in Indonesia aims to manage chronic diseases like hypertension. While combination antihypertensive therapy is recommended for many patients, evidence on its effectiveness in the PROLANIS setting remains limited. This study investigated the comparative effectiveness of single versus combination antihypertensive therapy in achieving blood pressure control among PROLANIS hypertension patients in Purbalingga Regency. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from PROLANIS hypertension patients in Purbalingga Regency from January-December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those receiving single antihypertensive therapy and those receiving combination therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg). Secondary outcomes included changes in blood pressure, medication adherence, and adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. A total of 1,250 patients were included, with 680 receiving single therapy and 570 receiving combination therapy. The proportion of patients achieving blood pressure control was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (65%) compared to the single therapy group (52%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.20). Combination therapy was also associated with greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. No significant differences were observed in medication adherence or adverse events between the two groups. Combination antihypertensive therapy is more effective than single therapy in achieving blood pressure control among PROLANIS hypertension patients in Purbalingga Regency. These findings support the use of combination therapy as the preferred approach for managing hypertension in this population.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-27

How to Cite

Comparative Effectiveness of Single Versus Combination Antihypertensive Therapy in PROLANIS Hypertension Patients: A Retrospective Study in Purbalingga Regency. (2024). Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports, 5(4), 1000-1015. https://doi.org/10.37275/amcr.v5i4.625

Article Metrics

316Abstract views
262Downloads
0Citations

Views and downloads recorded by this journal. Citation count from OpenAlex.

Most read articles by the same author(s)