Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in Post-Open Heart Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/jacr.v5i2.534Keywords:
Dexmedetomidine, Open heart surgery, Patient, PropofolAbstract
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are sedation drugs commonly used in patients after open heart surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients after open heart surgery in terms of sleep quality, delirium, and hemodynamics.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 120 patients after open heart surgery at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60). Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI), delirium was measured using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU), and hemodynamics were monitored continuously.
Results: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower PSQI scores (p < 0.05) and a lower incidence of delirium (p < 0.05) compared with patients receiving propofol. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than propofol in improving sleep quality and reducing delirium in patients after open heart surgery.
Authors
- Li Shen1*
- 1Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
Corresponding author Li Shen — shenli@yahoo.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research the non-exclusive right of first publication. Unless otherwise stated, articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Appropriate attribution, non-commercial use, and ShareAlike distribution of adaptations are required.
How to Cite
Article Metrics
Views and downloads recorded by this journal. Citation count from OpenAlex.